Updated researchStable reference

Cryptocurrency Relationships Revealed: Correlation Heatmaps

Compare how liquid cryptoasset returns move together now versus the prior window—and export a stable, citable view.

Topic first covered Current edition By CryptoDigest archive, CryptoDigest Research Desk
Fresh ·
Archive note

CryptoDigest first explored cryptoasset correlations in 2018. This edition rebuilds that research question with current data, transparent calculations, and downloadable results; it is not presented as a copy of the earlier article.

Figure 1Current and prior-window crypto return correlation

Choose 2–8 assets. Each main value is the current-window coefficient; the smaller value is its change from the immediately preceding equal-length window.

Return interval
Lookback
BTCETHBNBSOLDOGELINKBTC
1.00
0.000.00
0.000.00
0.000.00
0.000.00
0.000.00
ETH
0.000.00
1.00
0.000.00
0.000.00
0.000.00
0.000.00
BNB
0.000.00
0.000.00
1.00
0.000.00
0.000.00
0.000.00
SOL
0.000.00
0.000.00
0.000.00
1.00
0.000.00
0.000.00
DOGE
0.000.00
0.000.00
0.000.00
0.000.00
1.00
0.000.00
LINK
0.000.00
0.000.00
0.000.00
0.000.00
0.000.00
1.00
−1 moves opposite0 unrelated+1 moves togetherOutlined = ≥0.20 window change

Pearson correlation of 1d log returns. The smaller number is the change from the immediately preceding window. Correlation describes co-movement, not causation.

Correlation matrix data
AssetBTCETHBNBSOLDOGELINK
BTC1.0000.0000.0000.0000.0000.000
ETH0.0001.0000.0000.0000.0000.000
BNB0.0000.0001.0000.0000.0000.000
SOL0.0000.0000.0001.0000.0000.000
DOGE0.0000.0000.0000.0001.0000.000
LINK0.0000.0000.0000.0000.0001.000
Accessible data table

The interactive matrix includes a screen-reader table containing every selected coefficient.

At a glance

Key findings

  1. 01

    BTC and ETH move most closely in this window

    Their return correlation is 0.00. This describes co-movement, not a shared cause.

  2. 02

    BTC / ETH changed most

    The coefficient changed 0.00 from the previous equal window.

  3. 03

    Correlation is regime-dependent

    A coefficient can change when market-wide volatility, liquidity, or idiosyncratic information changes; one window should not be treated as permanent.

Historical layer

What the original resource established

The original CryptoDigest study asked a durable question: which major cryptocurrencies tended to move together, and did those relationships differ across periods? Its heatmap presentation was later cited in academic finance research.

This edition preserves that question, the matrix form, the distinction between stronger and weaker relationships, and the need to specify a sample period. It does not present reconstructed prose or unknown historic coefficients as recovered originals.

Current layer

A reproducible, window-aware lab

The interactive version computes coefficients from log returns, exposes the observation interval and lookback, compares adjacent equal-length windows, and flags absolute changes of at least 0.20 for inspection.

Exports contain derived coefficients—not raw provider observations. This edition is calculated from the latest retained production candles.

Method correlation-returns-1.0.0

Methodology

For each asset, price observations are ordered by UTC bucket and transformed to log returns: rₜ = ln(Pₜ / Pₜ₋₁). Pairwise Pearson coefficients are calculated on overlapping observations only.

The selected sample is divided into current and immediately preceding equal windows. A “meaningful break” is a descriptive review threshold when the absolute coefficient change is at least 0.20; it is not a calibrated statistical significance claim.

Quality rules

  • Exclude stale and invalid prices before computing returns.
  • Use internal asset identities rather than ticker text alone.
  • Display the interval, window, observation time, method version, and limitations.
  • Do not infer causality or future performance from correlation.

Limitations

  • Pearson correlation summarizes linear co-movement and can miss nonlinear relationships.
  • Results are sensitive to sampling interval, window length, missing observations, and market regime.
  • Shared quote-currency and market-wide factors can inflate apparent relationships.
  • Provider coverage, retention, and quality state can affect the resulting coefficients.
  • Past correlation does not predict return or establish a causal mechanism.

Data freshness

Fresh ·

Expected update cadence: daily for public research views; five minutes for current market state.

Data and reuse

Embed

Responsive figure with visible CryptoDigest attribution.

Sources and evidence

Primary and approved sources used for this edition.

SourceTierPublishedSupports
CryptoDigest derived market dataset (coinmarketcap)Normalized daily stored returns2Every displayed matrix value is computed from stored prices rather than generated prose.

Cite this resource

Stable edition 2026.08

Version history

  1. 2026.08

    Interactive lab, adjacent-window comparison, exports, embed, and explicit reconstructed-edition disclosure.

  2. Original

    Original CryptoDigest correlation heatmap study; exact archive metadata remains under recovery.